From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 7 23:24:19 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964751039C5B for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 23:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jude.obscure@yandex.com) Received: from forward104j.mail.yandex.net (forward104j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801:2::107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25DD771A8B for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 23:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jude.obscure@yandex.com) Received: from mxback1g.mail.yandex.net (mxback1g.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:162]) by forward104j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 07971426C7; Sun, 8 Jul 2018 02:24:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp2p.mail.yandex.net (smtp2p.mail.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b6:7]) by mxback1g.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id iUt9kXhWHi-OE1aRAsI; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 02:24:15 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1531005855; bh=8vyHtt7tg2aF5I+5MhPPQbab+4ivHjf5m70KdCUbDLI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ClvNvMa+xDoRiAhv+8uh1LMjP+a/Z5IbpvlgVPNjFa5erdALppq7DxZSEdgzRGPHm duf7zg4UCZ6W60Ye9l/0rAuBaGVOobRM8/4P0xxRWPogwPWfQZYkWPQCbG3o4vK/F2 oKEqE1aOWhy/a3FEICgI9ZTbq67buw+NUlga73wI= Received: by smtp2p.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id UdP2L3ekVw-ODp0HpFI; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 02:24:13 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1531005854; bh=8vyHtt7tg2aF5I+5MhPPQbab+4ivHjf5m70KdCUbDLI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:In-Reply-To; b=OEuOIXYsHosECouH2ths2a8w5kLyG/ohWoyRgeXq7NSeFnSGYRZ/31JzNrERnUk67 6aYiYdT1s6Qr6Dvc1Q9NjpRCT8gHpHOu0UkTw9KqVpvcUgFucE678NdB9/4VL6OX4m gB4CYz0d2QhXLwreAwFUqgfOnBdze6hmrUevbVhU= Authentication-Results: smtp2p.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com Subject: Re: Fwd: A request for unnested UFS implementation in MBR To: Polytropon , FreeBSD Questions References: <98201d37-2d65-34c6-969e-c9649f1a3ab1@yandex.com> <20180707231908.65a2e973.freebsd@edvax.de> <20180708001336.4097d20e.freebsd@edvax.de> <6bbfdaad-6872-1a6b-f176-471e57ac8d0a@yandex.com> <20180708004645.5a39c930.freebsd@edvax.de> <939bdcac-d9c3-2863-0e83-e1e87b61ded8@yandex.com> <20180708011444.82511c6a.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Manish Jain Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 04:52:11 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180708011444.82511c6a.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2018 23:24:19 -0000 On 07/08/18 04:44, Polytropon wrote: > They don't. With GPT, there is no need for BSD labels anymore. All I am saying is exactly the same possibility for MBR. We can create a UFS implementation, perhaps named ufs, that gets recorded directly in MBR table. Right now the implementation is freebsd::freebsd-ufs. If someone could just touch a few things, it improves things for eternity when we do not have bother about the extra layer (BSD). Any extra filesystems the user needs should be found in the EBR, not in the BSD. Why should a PC have multiple nesting schemas ? It only pains the user in the future when the need for the extra nest was only in the past (when there presumably was no EBR nest). Tx MJ