From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 4 11:35:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.va.home.com (ha1.rdc1.va.home.com [24.2.32.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A2637B4CF for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 11:35:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from cx443070b ([24.0.36.170]) by mail.rdc1.va.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP id <20001104193521.VQYM12834.mail.rdc1.va.home.com@cx443070b>; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 11:35:21 -0800 Message-ID: <003301c04696$acbefb90$aa240018@cx443070b> From: "Jeremiah Gowdy" To: "Heredity Choice" , "Allen Landsidel" , "Nick Slager" , "jadream" Cc: References: <000901c04631$5a8e4930$4fc7ddd1@STORK> Subject: Re: FBSD & Itanium? Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 11:37:31 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > FreeBSD Alpha does not have the maturity of FreeBSD Intel, but it is making > great progress because of a few enthusiasts who recognize its great > potential. That's excellent to hear. > Meanwhile the Itanium, if it ever becomes reality, is an answer in search of > a question. Which is why my vote goes to Hammer. Taking FreeBSD to x86-64 should not be anything near the work of taking it to any other 64bit Platform. > Paul Smith To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message