From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 11 19:47:12 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6406FD26;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:47:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CB6DB24;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:47:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.132] (vie-188-118-244-060.dsl.sil.at
 [188.118.244.60])
 by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CE3463F4FB;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:46:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:46:56 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r367888 - in head: accessibility/accerciser
 accessibility/jovie accessibility/kaccessible accessibility/kdeaccessibility4
 accessibility/kmag accessibility/kmousetool accessibility/kmout...
In-Reply-To: <20140911103218.GB1692@hades.panopticon>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409112122130.2669@tuna.site>
References: <201409102050.s8AKobw3056642@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20140911000146.GO43982@hades.panopticon>
 <20140911001739.GP43982@hades.panopticon>
 <alpine.LSU.2.11.1409110220490.2867@tuna.site>
 <20140911103218.GB1692@hades.panopticon>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:47:12 -0000

On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> I used INDEX-10 and the Tools/scripts/bump_revision.pl script
>> (that I had been using before for similar changes).
> Now I'm really interested how it's generated. Mine has 1693 mentions 
> of gcc, not 3000+

I downloaded INDEX-10 with `make fetchindex` on ref10-i386, and see 
the numbers below:

  % grep gcc-4.8 INDEX-10 | wc -l
    3386
  % Tools/scripts/bump_revision.pl -c -n -i INDEX-10 lang/gcc | wc -l
    3319

The numbers when generating INDEX-10 using `make index` are in the 
same ballpark.


I'm starting to feel really bad about this update of mine.  This is
not the first such PORTREVISION bump I am doing, and I do not see
where I made a substantial mistake.  Yet, something apparently went 
wrong. :-(

Gerald