From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 22 05:22:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA15791 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 05:22:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA15780 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 05:22:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co ([168.176.3.48]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with ESMTP id AAA29257 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 08:25:06 +0500 Message-ID: <367F9D58.D755DAB0@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 08:23:36 -0500 From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" Organization: U. Nacional de Colombia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hackers Subject: Re: questions/problems with vm_fault() in Stable References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In this thread I've heard good comment on UVM and also that there is not anyone really in charge of the VM. Would this indicate that we want UVM ?? Chuck Cranor's papers say a port could be done but, as I understand, our VM is faster. cheers, Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message