From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 09:19:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1CC37B401; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.reppep.com (www.reppep.com [66.92.104.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D2243FBD; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:19:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pepper@reppep.com) Received: from [129.85.219.160] (salt.rockefeller.edu [129.85.219.160]) by www.reppep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CE5FDAF; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:19:27 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: pepper@mail.reppep.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20030430155930.GA20596@eborcom.com> References: <20030428183759.M89408@pakastelohi.cypherpunks.to> <20030430090032.GL32395@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <20030430155930.GA20596@eborcom.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:17:21 -0400 To: Tom Hukins From: Chris Pepper Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: Lucky Green cc: Nik Clayton cc: freebsd-docs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "PROGRAMLISTING", "TITLE" not permitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:19:27 -0000 Doh, sorry. Chris At 4:59 PM +0100 2003/04/30, Tom Hukins wrote: >On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 09:28:44AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: >> At 10:00 AM +0100 2003/04/30, Nik Clayton wrote: >> >> >[1] > > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/writing-style.html#AEN3228 >> >> A good reference, but it confuses me a bit. According to >> "Content within elements should be indented by two spaces if the >> content runs over more than one line.", shouldn't the 'which' inside >> the be indented two more spaces, or should it say "Content >> within BLOCK elements"? > >No, because the content of does not run over more than one >line. > >I agree that this particular paragraph could be written more clearly, >though. I tried to improve it recently, but I don't feel completely >happy with the changes I made. -- Chris Pepper: Rockefeller University: