From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 09:55:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85730106564A; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE0A8FC08; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 09:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id p669tFng084067; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:55:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p669tFpT084066; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:55:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:55:15 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20110706095514.GF14797@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20110628155802.GA26562@alchemy.franken.de> <4E13B26D.6060203@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E13B26D.6060203@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: KOT MATPOCKuH , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: named crashes on assertion in rbtdb.c o? sparc64/SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:55:18 -0000 On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 05:55:09PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 06/28/2011 08:58, Marius Strobl wrote: > >Uhm, we once fixed a problem in the MD atomic implementation which > >still seems to present in the ISC copy. Could you please test whether > >the following patch makes a difference? > >http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff > > I haven't seen any verification from the OP that this patch solved the > problem, It simply doesn't so apparently there's another bug in other parts of BIND causing it to trip over that assertion. Still, the clobber lists of the sparc64 atomic bits were incomplete and fixing that IMO was the right thing to do. > however it did pass 'make universe' on both 9-current and > RELENG_8, so I've committed it to those 2 branches along with the recent > update. I'll also submit it upstream. > Thanks! Marius