From owner-freebsd-numerics@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 20:02:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: numerics@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B570106566B for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D158FC08 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8OK2Al7022293; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:02:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8OK2AXm022292; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:02:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:02:10 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20120924200210.GA22228@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20120925035402.C1433@besplex.bde.org> <20120924195121.GA22138@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120924195121.GA22138@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LDBL_MAX broken on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of high quality implementation of libm functions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:02:11 -0000 On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:51:21PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:05:42AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > I just noticed that LDBL_MAX is completely broken on i386. > > > > It seems history is repeating itself. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-August/013007.html > > I can't find the other email exchange I had with at > leaset Warner about LDBL_MAX. I distinctly remember > asking why LDBL_MAX on i386 was 2^64 instead of 2^53. > The other thread (well at least part of it) is at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-August/053852.html -- Steve