From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Mar  3 18:05:45 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA16210
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.risc.org (taob@trt-on2-01.netcom.ca [207.181.81.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA16205
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 18:05:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (taob@localhost)
          by alpha.risc.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id VAA16574; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21:05:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 21:05:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@risc.org>
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
In-Reply-To: <199703040123.UAA00592@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970303210308.16490B-100000@alpha.risc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote:
> 
> Damn annoying.  Although genx claims the next client is much faster
> on intel and alpha platforms, so we should be able to vault over it,
> if they are correct.

    The 233-MHz PPro running FreeBSD is still easily the fastest
individual CPU on the list though.  Now all we need is someone to run
3.0-SMP on a 8-node PPro233 system to blow away that E6000 you just
added to the list.  :)
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"