Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:40:23 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204646] 10.2 iSCSI backed zpool shows imporper warnings about non-native block sizes that 10.1 doesn't show
Message-ID:  <bug-204646-5312-tBizr2xxXc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204646-5312@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204646-5312@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204646

Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mav@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #2 from Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> ---
recordsize and volblocksize properties are functionally equal, except that one
of them is used for datasets, while another is for zvols.  Both of them CTL
report to initiator as a physical sector size, since that is smallest item that
can be written to disks or read back, exactly as for real physical sectors.

So I don't see any problem from CTL side here. The only problem I see is in ZFS
on initiator side -- it never sets ashift above 13 (8K), that is reasonable,
but it still complains about that as an error, that is pointless.  I think ZFS
code should be fixed to just ignore any physical block sizes above 8K, as if
they would not be reported.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204646-5312-tBizr2xxXc>