From owner-freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Mon Nov 30 19:40:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FD3A3C687 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1527D1A9D for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAUJeNbF040284 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:40:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204646] 10.2 iSCSI backed zpool shows imporper warnings about non-native block sizes that 10.1 doesn't show Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:40:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: misc X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: mav@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 19:40:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204646 Alexander Motin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mav@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Alexander Motin --- recordsize and volblocksize properties are functionally equal, except that one of them is used for datasets, while another is for zvols. Both of them CTL report to initiator as a physical sector size, since that is smallest item that can be written to disks or read back, exactly as for real physical sectors. So I don't see any problem from CTL side here. The only problem I see is in ZFS on initiator side -- it never sets ashift above 13 (8K), that is reasonable, but it still complains about that as an error, that is pointless. I think ZFS code should be fixed to just ignore any physical block sizes above 8K, as if they would not be reported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.