From owner-dev-commits-src-branches@freebsd.org Wed Dec 30 17:53:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-branches@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9F44C9DC3; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5f6G0BlCz4RDS; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06D25170FD; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:53:39 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: John Baldwin Cc: Ryan Libby , Kyle Evans , src-committers , dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-branches@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 269b7d8ac1e5 - stable/12 - tftpd: tests: raise targeted cstd to c11 Message-ID: <20201230175339.GA29398@lonesome.com> References: <202012292306.0BTN6ivw093358@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <0af13399-f119-06aa-c249-2fe8069dd631@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0af13399-f119-06aa-c249-2fe8069dd631@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4D5f6G0BlCz4RDS X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-branches@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: "Commit messages for the stable branches of the src repository." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 17:53:42 -0000 On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 09:43:50AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > Just to be explicit, we do not care about building amd64 with 4.2.1 at this > point on 12.x. AFAIK the only use case for gcc4.2.1 is powerpc* < 13. (I check new ports on powerpc64 vs. gcc4.2.1. I will be glad to see the end of it.) mcl