From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 5 09:28:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA21420 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:28:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA21413 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA06316; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:26:14 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199708051626.JAA06316@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Parallel port bus code? To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:26:13 -0700 (MST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199708050849.SAA27635@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Aug 5, 97 06:19:06 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Looks like it's my week to be ignored. I've had exactly one response > to my announcement last week of the new parallel port 'bus' code. > > Should I take this as an implicit go-ahead and splat it in? If you think it works, I'd say "go for it". Have you worked out any PLIP/ZIP-driver/LAPlink issues already? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.