From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 7 12:53:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA03365 for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com ([140.145.230.177]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA03355; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 12:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA07506; Wed, 7 Aug 1996 21:52:47 +0200 (MET DST) To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Nate Williams , "Rodney W. Grimes" , peter@spinner.dialix.com (Peter Wemm), current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whither gcc 2.7? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 07 Aug 1996 12:12:31 PDT." <199608071912.MAA00385@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 1996 21:52:46 +0200 Message-ID: <7504.839447566@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199608071912.MAA00385@freefall.freebsd.org>, "Justin T. Gibbs" writ >Any way you slice it, we'll have to deal with this issue as soon as we >start supporting more than one arch. In fact, as Nate pointed out, the >PC98 stuff has already made this a problem we need to solve. I still think that we need to sit down and think VERY carefully before we import >all< of gcc. I will be against it all the way. If people want to play with other archs, they can go pick up the original gcc sources, and extract the bits they need. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.