From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org  Sat Mar 19 15:43:33 2016
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE5AD6331;
 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:43:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st)
Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C215DCD;
 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st)
Received: from [192.168.1.22] (249.red-81-37-208.dynamicip.rima-tde.net
 [81.37.208.249])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0710A43BD5;
 Sat, 19 Mar 2016 10:43:22 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: svn commit: r411385 - head/www/lighttpd/files
To: Jan Beich <jbeich@vfemail.net>, Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201603190938.u2J9cF4c014563@repo.freebsd.org>
 <pouq-db4y-wny@vfemail.net>
Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org
From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
Message-ID: <56ED7396.4050104@marino.st>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:43:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <pouq-db4y-wny@vfemail.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>, 
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:43:34 -0000

On 3/19/2016 11:18 AM, Jan Beich wrote:
> Dirk Meyer <dinoex@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Can you bump PORTREVISION ? According to Porter's Handbook
>
>    PORTREVISION must be increased each time a change is made to the port
>    that changes the generated package in any way. That includes changes
>    that only affect a package built with *non-default options*.

Is that true?
It's open for interpretation, and I've never interpreted it that way. 
I've seen other use the same rationale (doesn't affect packages with 
default options) as a reason not to bump.

If all things are perfect, I agree with you, but people get pretty upset 
when a port rebuilds for a weak reason.  Making something huge rebuild 
to help out people that customize the port might be "weak" in that sense.

In any case, the above interpretation is news for me.

John