Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:29:52 -0500 From: Russell Meek <russell@russellmeek.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I have 2 copies of OpenSSL? Message-ID: <43816960.1000106@russellmeek.net> In-Reply-To: <20051119005143.GB53252@oracle.local.lan> References: <20051118005404.GA53252@oracle.local.lan> <437D6971.50309@russellmeek.net> <20051119005143.GB53252@oracle.local.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Justin Meyer wrote: >Hi Russell! > >On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Russell E. Meek wrote: > > > >>Justin Meyer wrote: >> >> >> >>>What gives? Is the way things should be? Or did I foul something up >>>somewhere along the way through my upgrades? If I did mess something up, >>>what should I do to fix it? >>> >>> >>> > > > >>Justin, >> >>How about trying this, you have the most recent version of openssl >>installed in base due to the upgrade to 6.0 - release. >> >>If you have the OpenSSL port installed why don't you uninstall the port >>and place the following in your /etc/make.conf file >> >>WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes >> >>This will force all ports you install going foward to use the base >>install of OpenSSL and not to install OpenSSL as a dependency from ports. >> >>You could then make deinstall, make install clean && make distclean any >>port that requires OpenSSL, Ruby for instance. >> >>This should make it build with the base install, eliminating the version >>conflict. >> >> > >That seems to have done the trick, Russell; the script works again! >Thank you very much for the suggestions :) > > > No problem, anytime
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43816960.1000106>