From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 15:39:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9314516A4CE; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:39:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0273243D1F; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:39:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C00265213; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:39:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 68561-01-14; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:39:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (adsl-67-121-95-134.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.121.95.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E43651F4; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:39:41 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7EA0965F6; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:39:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:39:33 -0700 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20041021153933.GK13756@empiric.icir.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andre Oppermann , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org> cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:39:44 -0000 On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > I intend to remove T/TCP (transactional TCP) support from our TCP > implementation for the following reasons: Go ahead and kill the old thing, it's time. I agree. > Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide > a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality: I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on working on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would be a good starting point. Regards, BMS