From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 15:47:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035B01065672 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zkolic@sbb.rs) Received: from smtp4.sbb.rs (smtp4.sbb.rs [89.216.2.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFD18FC0A for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mycenae (cable-178-148-97-245.dynamic.sbb.rs [178.148.97.245]) by smtp4.sbb.rs (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id q8PFhgSF001689 for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:43:47 +0200 Received: by mycenae (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D3EB55C2F; Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:44:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:44:13 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120925154413.GA1234@mycenae.sbb.rs> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.3.2 X-SBB-Virus-Status: clean X-SBB-Spam-Score: -1.8 Subject: cx_lowest on 9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:47:59 -0000 Dear list! For a long time I used powerd and cpufreq with options: performance_cx_lowest="LOW" economy_cx_lowest="LOW" in rc.conf on my laptop. Reading posts on the net I learned that I have/had to use C2 and C3. What would be the preffered option in coming 9.1? There is a chance I misread the whole thing. On old desktop I avoided cx part, but gonna try in out now. Also, I'd like to learn what the list thinks about throttle option set to 1. Any news on 9.1 schedule? Best regards Zoran