From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 23 00:05:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABA2106566B for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-hackers@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC848FC1A for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NYTVg-0003Vs-L9 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:05:52 +0100 Received: from 93-138-99-190.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([93.138.99.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:05:52 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 93-138-99-190.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:05:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:05:29 +0100 Lines: 8 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 93-138-99-190.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090612) Sender: news Subject: A 7 vs 8 db benchmark X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 00:05:57 -0000 This is a bit old, I forgot to post it earlier: http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/10/05/freebsd_8_is_it_worth_to_upgrade Some interesting graphs there. Jeff Roberson said the bogus CPU topology shouldn't influence end-performance much. He thinks the lockmgr rewrite was responsible for most of the big performance difference.