From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr  3 01:42:23 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D83F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  3 Apr 2005 01:42:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from alogis.com (firewall2.alogis.com [62.8.223.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D9F43D2F
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun,  3 Apr 2005 01:42:20 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from hk@alogis.com)
Received: from alogis.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j331gIWv058263;
	Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:42:18 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from hk@alogis.com)
Received: (from hk@localhost)
	by alogis.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j331gIDY058262;
	Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:42:18 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from hk)
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:42:18 +0200
From: Holger Kipp <hk@intserv.int1.b.intern>
To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20050403014218.GA57319@intserv.int1.b.intern>
References: <3aaaa3a0503271958205ca8e1@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0503271958205ca8e1@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 11:52:54 +0000
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: freebsd naming of releases
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:42:23 -0000

On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 04:58:21AM +0100, Chris wrote:
> After what happened with 5.x releases would it be a good idea to name

No, it isn't. Nothing happened with 5.x releases.

> current releases different.  eg. 6.1-dev 6.2-dev instead of
> 6.1-release.

We had this type of discussion already several times. Search the
archive for corresponding posts. This discussion is pointless and
only wastes bandwith.

The real problem is that people do not read and/or think.
A different naming scheme won't change that.

Regards,
Holger Kipp