Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 22:26:13 -0400 From: "Adam C. Migus" <adam@migus.org> To: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> Cc: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LibH or Anaconda ?? Message-ID: <1085451973.40b2aec5147df@webservices.migus.org> In-Reply-To: <200405241910.49207.david@usermode.org> References: <BAY19-F18Ut65BVEpVR0000c430@hotmail.com> <200405241910.49207.david@usermode.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting David Johnson <david@usermode.org>: > On Sunday 23 May 2004 08:52 pm, С ·Éçç wrote: > > > So , why don't you guys to think about migration rather than > > rewriting a completely > > different architecture for the installer ? > > Anaconda is certainly an option, but I doubt a binary-only Anaconda > is. > Think about it. We need to go beyond running Redhat's installer in > Linux compatibility mode. Also. SuSE just open sourced their YaST > installer. That's an option as well. > > -- > David Johnson > ___________________ > http://www.usermode.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-libh@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-libh > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-libh-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I hear great things about SuSE's YaST and I generally think that using it or Anaconda in the form of a native, ported, perhaps even enhanced application is a great idea in general. In summary, both Anaconda and YaST seem to have proven themselves in the industry and giving people something they're already farmiliar with from a UI stand-point is usually a win. -- Adam C. Migus -- http://people.migus.org/~adam/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1085451973.40b2aec5147df>