Date: 30 Jan 2001 11:56:22 -0800 From: Kevin Mills <kmills@a6l.net> To: "Jeff Roberson" <jeff@midstream.com> Cc: "'Alfred Perlstein'" <bright@wintelcom.net>, "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Kevents/libc_r ? Message-ID: <85puh4stjt.fsf@diablo.in.a6l.net> In-Reply-To: "Jeff Roberson"'s message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:17:46 -0800" References: <31E4B6337A4FD411BD45000102472E0C05E74D@EMAIL_SERVER>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jeff Roberson" <jeff@midstream.com> writes: > Is that true in -CURRENT as well? It looks to me like it calls kevents with > a 0 timespec and then calls into the scheduler. > > > * Jeff Roberson <jeff@midstream.com> [010130 11:05] wrote: > > > Does anyone know if it's safe to use kevents with pthreads yet? I poked > > > around and saw that it is handled in libc_r/uthread, but I also noticed > that > > > my process that should be waiting in kqread is actually waiting in poll. > If > > > I remove -pthread from the compile line it waits in kqread again! Is > > > pthreads just using poll for timeouts? > > > > pthreads puts the kevent into the array of pollfds that it uses to > > do non-blocking operations. Wait a second here... what does this mean? Am I reading that when using non-blocking sockets and kevent with -pthread I'm actually using poll? Please explain - I'm trying to get away from poll! Thank you! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85puh4stjt.fsf>