From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 10 18:07:44 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FC8FD23C1 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 18:07:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shurd@llnw.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB71778526 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shurd@llnw.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y72-v6so4248031lfd.2 for ; Thu, 10 May 2018 11:07:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=llnw.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dQrjkTjKVgbMCnRr7sixESDyrQJRfuaoojSRnycbFIk=; b=HOm703uQl5M7jId9nbRWW9rm6TU9U5rycL9pJuDWepYLDC0aOzf+l9jJwr6JdDQXJ9 zV4mMd9/vkpZTxelnQf0ERLGiS8oFxkMWB1UpYtbMri+3XIkYJ4gZLzNF1JnQhrFBNpt fL2LxkApjUwDXat4EgHBPSJdacj1//8anLssIQDM9u15KKKq1cO6hB9a883UIjbA0rhF JEkM16ZU+GnTeawv/n8gpH5CRMBps0FZ27fVwRT/fR1/UeZdN28XhUOV1V0JJJXnPbc/ U1Cuyp/1bvLh3N6aDXf7LQkJ3t2wH5mCeTkzE0Pc1IcA6Hh0CvLtlkw8C8Dalen0ahd2 REQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dQrjkTjKVgbMCnRr7sixESDyrQJRfuaoojSRnycbFIk=; b=lXfAwfVIq8kFxeCMxuZBIohu+xHemoBrMZcm6Nqd5+6xnOk4H7cfWerXt+KVWPqaoQ 2kdRiPKyxvQPyS5Q7KkW8+cyJslU/CywrQOD/0OA4xQvTcEifgPlYzjXA8j/EQR7ptiW qzk9zX1we8HTpZYRW5foS7yMB5da4inqUb9XOXkMG7JJtNtiQYNcP0nxCfDKzrNNSIn1 PETsH4ik/FvFCJfp3Sd1Oc6TzIdZBlMFhgjEHwwglYNwtc4St5nZ2Nv2Kt0ZY7D0SuJQ uaGCetAsPOoDxtLQHWAa492+Vshs6vAqewrRv9zt/hv9qid1Drm2UI+Fsgfn0TqoZCJH Vz2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwch0ag8z4nN5YbR/NyM6h8F2UtOqE9oXclVyryF+8sQtFPs+4/l JxNLOimosdGYsHrjnMFrRo/tAJ1k/j68eXOgJzIsRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrBpt0bOJ4JbSRcQckSBDk1tbToCAI+UEMpd37dheVNoMtLZKbzq6IlUr7PR+dCSKrGAM+iAtA2MMZ/BfHEu74= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5d57:: with SMTP id r84-v6mr1781250ljb.125.1525975662219; Thu, 10 May 2018 11:07:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.114.10 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2018 11:07:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5AF4891A.6030904@omnilan.de> References: <201805072142.w47LgN1R041002@repo.freebsd.org> <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de> <5AF17134.7020602@omnilan.de> <5AF1CF0F.4040909@omnilan.de> <65972f0d-2873-42ea-464c-a3db543abafb@freebsd.org> <5AF1E073.5010701@omnilan.de> <5AF4875C.5000201@omnilan.de> <5AF4891A.6030904@omnilan.de> From: Stephen Hurd Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 14:07:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: iflib-if_em tests with HEAD and lagg panic [Was: Re: svn commit: r333338 - in stable/11/sys: dev/bnxt kern net sys] To: Harry Schmalzbauer Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Stephen Hurd , Kevin Bowling , mmacy@mattmacy.io Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 18:07:44 -0000 No need to test the latest revision unless/until you get a LOR or a panic (both should be possible with the revision you currently have). With the recent addition of a simple EBR API, mmacy@ is working on a better solution. If possible, it would be great to have you re-test it once that is up. On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bez=C3=BCglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 19:54 (loca= ltime): > =E2=80=A6 > > Please excuse that I'm not familar with the phabricator and just did > > "raw diff download" after briefly flying over the comments. > > According to st_mtime this was on May 9th, 08:14:02 UTC (10:14 local > > (CEST) time). > > No idea what timezone phabricator reports to me, most likely respecting > > local time. Which means latest revision was part of my test =E2=80=93 = but I'm > > Oh, I missed "pm". > Phabricator reports Wed, May 9, 9:49 PM > as last revision, my > download was from 10:14 _AM_... > But if the web site was respecting local time zone, I guess it would > respect local time format, so not PM, but 21:49... > So I think it's most likely any UTC+>2 time, so the revision I tested > was probably Diff 42294 . > > Just tell me if it was useful for you to test the latest revision again. > > -harry > --=20 [image: Limelight Networks] Stephen Hurd* Principal Engineer* EXPERIENCE FIRST. +1 616 848 0643 <+1+616+848+0643> www.limelight.com [image: Facebook] [image: LinkedIn] [image: Twitter]