From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 12 19:40:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA001065707 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE17F8FC2C for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1CJe6Ea082886 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1CJe6n3082885; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:06 GMT Message-Id: <201002121940.o1CJe6n3082885@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org From: "Eduardo Schoedler" Cc: Subject: Re: kern/141314: Network Performance has decreased by 30% [regression] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eduardo Schoedler List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:40:07 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/141314; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Eduardo Schoedler" To: , Cc: Subject: Re: kern/141314: Network Performance has decreased by 30% [regression] Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:14:54 -0200 Hello. First of all, sorry my bad english. I work in an small ISP in Brazil. This thread worried us a little bit, because we are going in production an Freebsd 8.0-RELEASE. We have stressed our brand new Dell servers (R210 and R410) with Freebsd 7.2-RELEASE and 8.0-RELEASE. None of them showed the problem. Here are the results of our tests (2-way tests): 7.2 i386 [R410] x 8.0 amd64 [R210]: Iperf = 931M | 98586,46K 8.0 amd64 [R210] x 7.2 i386 [R410]: Iperf = 931M | 114023,54K 8.0 amd64 [R410] x 8.0 amd64 [R210]: Iperf = 931M | 99752,64K 8.0 amd64 [R210] x 8.0 amd64 [R410]: Iperf = 931M | 114088,72K Best Regards, -- Eduardo Schoedler