From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 5 10:29: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from 200-191-152-225-as.acessonet.com.br (200-191-152-225-as.acessonet.com.br [200.191.152.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F356A37BC60 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 10:28:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lioux@uol.com.br) Received: (qmail 895 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Jun 2000 16:23:36 -0000 From: lioux@uol.com.br Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 13:23:36 -0300 To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: lioux@uol.com.br, "Scot W. Hetzel" , Satoshi Asami , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS handling Message-ID: <20000605132336.A780@Fedaykin.here> References: <200006021931.MAA67682@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200006031234.OAA13213@peedub.muc.de> <20000603144658.A7092@Fedaykin.here> <00a901bfcd8a$e6b0f180$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <20000604012453.A446@Fedaykin.here> <393B69CF.44614467@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <393B69CF.44614467@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:50:23AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:50:23AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > lioux@uol.com.br wrote: > > > > Following that line. > > Why don't we add: > > > > @ldconfig > > @ldunconfig > > > > These would simplify all libraries. Who mentioned cpp? > > That really sounds marvelous, however, do we desire > > the extra level of complexity? I do, but do the others? > > I rather like to see something like the following in the port's Makefile: > USE_LDCONFIG=yes > and optional: > LDCONFIG_DIRS=/foo/lib /bar/lib (defaulting to ${PREFIX}/lib of course). > > which would add all necessary magic to the PLIST. This one has my vote. Regards, Mario Ferreira To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message