From owner-freebsd-doc  Fri Jun 25 11: 1:57 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 35E641559E; Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA67626;
	Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp>
Cc: Nik Clayton <nclayton@lehman.com>,
	Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-translate@ngo.org.uk, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Resolution: FDP reorganisation 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 21:20:54 +0900."
             <199906251220.VAA22552@sakura.snipe.rim.or.jp> 
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 11:01:36 -0700
Message-ID: <67622.930333696@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> OK, I'll explain more.
> 
> A.  Why 'ja' is better than 'ja.*'

OK, so the Japanese folks have some sort of auto-conversion.  That
takes care of strictly the Japanese language, but what about the
Chinese folks or the others that Nik pointed out?  It seemed to me
that he was looking for a much wider convention here, not just a
solution to the ja problem.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message