From owner-freebsd-smp  Thu May  1 17:17:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA28244
          for smp-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 17:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [204.160.242.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA28233;
          Thu, 1 May 1997 17:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harlie.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [204.160.242.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA13665; Thu, 1 May 1997 17:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 17:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>
To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net>
cc: "Eric J. Chet" <ejc@bazzle.com>,
        "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, macgyver@db-net.com, Don@PartsNow.com,
        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 7860 
In-Reply-To: <199705012029.OAA08130@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970501171552.9871A-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 1 May 1997, Steve Passe wrote:

>   And you could save a few $hundred by going
> with the 256k cache versions: Pro 150 256K    $199, actually CHEAPER than
> the P5x166 (but avoid 150mHz, means a bus speed of 60mHz vs 66mHz for
> 166mHz).  This makes the difference almost nil, (but I really recommend
> the 512k cache).  You *probably* could overclock 150s to 166, I have been
> overclocking my P6-166x512s to 200mHz for almost a month now without any
> sign of trouble.

I've had my hands on three P6-150's, and all will make world at 180.  I
still run them at 166 for the bus speed.