Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 17:17:12 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com> To: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> Cc: "Eric J. Chet" <ejc@bazzle.com>, "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freefall.freebsd.org>, msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, macgyver@db-net.com, Don@PartsNow.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 7860 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970501171552.9871A-100000@harlie.bfd.com> In-Reply-To: <199705012029.OAA08130@Ilsa.StevesCafe.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 1 May 1997, Steve Passe wrote: > And you could save a few $hundred by going > with the 256k cache versions: Pro 150 256K $199, actually CHEAPER than > the P5x166 (but avoid 150mHz, means a bus speed of 60mHz vs 66mHz for > 166mHz). This makes the difference almost nil, (but I really recommend > the 512k cache). You *probably* could overclock 150s to 166, I have been > overclocking my P6-166x512s to 200mHz for almost a month now without any > sign of trouble. I've had my hands on three P6-150's, and all will make world at 180. I still run them at 166 for the bus speed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.970501171552.9871A-100000>