From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 11 15:51:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2006C16A4CE; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:51:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vhost109.his.com (vhost109.his.com [216.194.225.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E2943D1D; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:51:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brad@stop.mail-abuse.org) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (localhost.his.com [127.0.0.1]) by vhost109.his.com (8.12.11/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i8BFpJGJ002842; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 11:51:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from brad@stop.mail-abuse.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: bs663385@127.0.0.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4142D648.5040605@elischer.org> References: <200409110959.i8B9xj01048328@gw.catspoiler.org> <4142D648.5040605@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:48:08 +0200 To: Julian Elischer From: Brad Knowles Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: Don Lewis cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: page fault in sched_pin() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 15:51:26 -0000 At 3:41 AM -0700 2004-09-11, Julian Elischer wrote: > I am not sure why this appeared to work on my system. My only thought is that > I wasn't booting off the kernel I thught I was booting off. There was a big > rush to get it in before scott changed the name. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we're in freeze for RELENG_5 preparing for it to become the new -STABLE branch, right? Should not this change have been made only to HEAD, and then merged to RELENG_5 if it was found to be necessary? Assuming that's the case, then why the rush? I'm just curious as to how a mistake like this could have made it into both -HEAD and RELENG_5 simultaneously.... -- Brad Knowles, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755 SAGE member since 1995. See for more info.