Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:24:51 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org>
To:        Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 2b9b771202b2 - main - www/luakit-devel: update to 2.3.1-6
Message-ID:  <20221017092451.6qf4z6gmez7pd2hj@aching.in.mat.cc>
In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7UJp4K3-7=saS7sBowaDPekhmXqjOTE7yHYk5OAFfdmUnw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <202210121908.29CJ8aGO082553@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20221013134520.vresa2tbdkflowdw@aniel.nours.eu> <CAFDf7UK5Bk9wXeL38-j1Q2A1vh0B_7ZaErxE2ncosMOSGs9jVA@mail.gmail.com> <20221016083759.vx46x6ei7if6dxuy@aching.in.mat.cc> <CAFDf7UJp4K3-7=saS7sBowaDPekhmXqjOTE7yHYk5OAFfdmUnw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--uly6gqoxwff7ld4j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> portepoch should be used with caution and when is no chance to avoid it,
> e.g., upstream versioning changes.

PORTEPOCH should be used when it is needed, like any tool. In this case,
the package version goes backwards, so it should be used.

> That's not the case on this port that suffers from a bad version design
> from the beginning:
>=20
> First portepoch: 2.2.8 -> 2.2.1*-16*
> Second portepoch (actual): 2.3-26 -> 2.3.1*-6*
>=20
> *-<commits count>* is the number of commits
>=20
> In the future will be more portepoch bumping due to '*-'*<commits count>
> being interpertated as '*.'*<committs count>
>=20
> IMHO, solution is to think in a better port versioning.
>=20
> I will talk with maintainer to see what is his opinion.
>=20
> Thanks
>=20
> Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> escreveu no dia domingo, 16/10/2022 =E0(=
s)
> 09:38:
>=20
> > On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 01:12:19AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Yes, you are right
> > > pkg version -t 2.3.1.6,1 2.3.26,1 =3D=3D <
> > >
> > > -DISTVERSION=3D 2.3-26
> > > +DISTVERSION=3D 2.3.1-6
> > >
> > > This will cause problems in the future and we cannot bump PORTEPOCH f=
or
> > > this reason.
> >
> > This is exactly what PORTEPOCH is for, so I do not understand your
> > sentence.
> >
> > --
> > Mathieu Arnold
> >
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Nuno Teixeira
> FreeBSD Committer (ports)

--=20
Mathieu Arnold

--uly6gqoxwff7ld4j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEFD4jMKwz5Ud8Ywu3ecmT/A9inX0FAmNNH2JfFIAAAAAALgAo
aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE0
M0UyMzMwQUMzM0U1NDc3QzYzMEJCNzc5Qzk5M0ZDMEY2MjlEN0QACgkQecmT/A9i
nX33BggAjowlY+SocrGq0yEWqQHBzwYLkrNB0XbFnYHrVRznqBRK9QocKZLVsFzl
85lUJNaHp23nO1C9zzSuPQi8houAanwB4abhuFnyv64oZJIpVGBvXaQSa6DOfEkY
EX2LdVfosdDURCwoOBD86fQORvXIwIFVbAugyedZVSDsYTp8FHgKUXwlF2pINnRE
drWtrrE/fPoZOYpfMdErF+Z226bwtHaqFEULT7ZTzq20ikQrUMEzyn2agjnlRzrF
xOc4YBGVoQ6/XUVI6YWc8DZyoOMQ9cl3ju+77vgHVsiVJHU418veT1EbUmvtsptn
oQbMXRzgXTtZE/gYd6pq/EaPmppkzg==
=6e62
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uly6gqoxwff7ld4j--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20221017092451.6qf4z6gmez7pd2hj>