Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 11:24:51 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> To: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 2b9b771202b2 - main - www/luakit-devel: update to 2.3.1-6 Message-ID: <20221017092451.6qf4z6gmez7pd2hj@aching.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7UJp4K3-7=saS7sBowaDPekhmXqjOTE7yHYk5OAFfdmUnw@mail.gmail.com> References: <202210121908.29CJ8aGO082553@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20221013134520.vresa2tbdkflowdw@aniel.nours.eu> <CAFDf7UK5Bk9wXeL38-j1Q2A1vh0B_7ZaErxE2ncosMOSGs9jVA@mail.gmail.com> <20221016083759.vx46x6ei7if6dxuy@aching.in.mat.cc> <CAFDf7UJp4K3-7=saS7sBowaDPekhmXqjOTE7yHYk5OAFfdmUnw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--uly6gqoxwff7ld4j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 01:21:09PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hi, >=20 > portepoch should be used with caution and when is no chance to avoid it, > e.g., upstream versioning changes. PORTEPOCH should be used when it is needed, like any tool. In this case, the package version goes backwards, so it should be used. > That's not the case on this port that suffers from a bad version design > from the beginning: >=20 > First portepoch: 2.2.8 -> 2.2.1*-16* > Second portepoch (actual): 2.3-26 -> 2.3.1*-6* >=20 > *-<commits count>* is the number of commits >=20 > In the future will be more portepoch bumping due to '*-'*<commits count> > being interpertated as '*.'*<committs count> >=20 > IMHO, solution is to think in a better port versioning. >=20 > I will talk with maintainer to see what is his opinion. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> escreveu no dia domingo, 16/10/2022 =E0(= s) > 09:38: >=20 > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2022 at 01:12:19AM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Yes, you are right > > > pkg version -t 2.3.1.6,1 2.3.26,1 =3D=3D < > > > > > > -DISTVERSION=3D 2.3-26 > > > +DISTVERSION=3D 2.3.1-6 > > > > > > This will cause problems in the future and we cannot bump PORTEPOCH f= or > > > this reason. > > > > This is exactly what PORTEPOCH is for, so I do not understand your > > sentence. > > > > -- > > Mathieu Arnold > > >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Nuno Teixeira > FreeBSD Committer (ports) --=20 Mathieu Arnold --uly6gqoxwff7ld4j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEFD4jMKwz5Ud8Ywu3ecmT/A9inX0FAmNNH2JfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE0 M0UyMzMwQUMzM0U1NDc3QzYzMEJCNzc5Qzk5M0ZDMEY2MjlEN0QACgkQecmT/A9i nX33BggAjowlY+SocrGq0yEWqQHBzwYLkrNB0XbFnYHrVRznqBRK9QocKZLVsFzl 85lUJNaHp23nO1C9zzSuPQi8houAanwB4abhuFnyv64oZJIpVGBvXaQSa6DOfEkY EX2LdVfosdDURCwoOBD86fQORvXIwIFVbAugyedZVSDsYTp8FHgKUXwlF2pINnRE drWtrrE/fPoZOYpfMdErF+Z226bwtHaqFEULT7ZTzq20ikQrUMEzyn2agjnlRzrF xOc4YBGVoQ6/XUVI6YWc8DZyoOMQ9cl3ju+77vgHVsiVJHU418veT1EbUmvtsptn oQbMXRzgXTtZE/gYd6pq/EaPmppkzg== =6e62 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uly6gqoxwff7ld4j--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20221017092451.6qf4z6gmez7pd2hj>