From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 11:19:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A1816A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:19:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (fast.dnswatch.com [216.177.243.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92DB43D2F for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:19:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: from fast.dnswatch.com (localhost.dnswatch.com [127.0.0.1]) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j3PBJYsm044631 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:19:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by fast.dnswatch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id j3PBJXE3044630; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:19:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from null@dnswatch.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fast.dnswatch.com: www set sender to null@dnswatch.com using -f Received: from ns0.1command.com ([216.177.243.38]) (DNSwatch.com_WebMail authenticated user null) by webmail.dnswatch.com with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1362.216.177.243.38.1114427973.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> References: <20050424175543.71041.qmail@web51805.mail.yahoo.com><20050424151517.O68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com><3822.216.177.243.38.1114385370.localmail@webmail.dnswatch.com><20050425000459.GA28667@xor.obsecurity.org> <6.2.1.2.0.20050424204611.072105a0@64.7.153.2> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 04:19:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "/dev/null" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org User-Agent: DNSwatch.com_WebMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 11:19:37 -0000 Greetings, You know, it didn't occur to me until just now that the box in question here *always* has other boxes FS' mounted. That box is sort of a Central Command Center. So has many of the other servers FS' mounted for various tasks and so forth. I'll have to look closer at this. -Chris > At 08:04 PM 24/04/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> > Performance in other areas seems to be lagging as well. >> >>Since you were wrong about the above, I have to ask whether you have >>evidence of this. > > There was a lengthy discussion along with bonnie, dd, postmark and iozone > results discussed in January on the freebsd-performance list that > illustrate the disk io difference between RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 at the > time. > > I also tried a CURRENT snapshot then and there wasn't much of a difference > between it and RELENG_5. > > ---Mike > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > //////////////////////////////////////////////////// If only Western Electric had found a way to offer binary licenses for the UNIX system back in 1974, the UNIX system would be running on all PC's today rather than DOS/Windows. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////