From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 18 04:23:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939961065678; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FDA8FC1B; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0I4Mrpd018670; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:22:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Robert Noland In-Reply-To: <1232252455.22215.8.camel@ferret.2hip.net> References: <86vdsghdum.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> <1232157465.1547.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <864ozyskxn.fsf@pluton.xbsd.name> <1232246393.51752.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1232250663.22215.4.camel@ferret.2hip.net> <1232251815.51752.8.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1232252053.22215.6.camel@ferret.2hip.net> <1232252222.51752.9.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1232252455.22215.8.camel@ferret.2hip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Q3WGcvGWAK5ppj7TCYB7" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:23:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1232252593.51752.11.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Should Gnome2 meta port include security/pinentry-gtk2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:23:13 -0000 --=-Q3WGcvGWAK5ppj7TCYB7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 23:20 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 23:17 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 23:14 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 23:10 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 22:51 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 21:39 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2009-01-17 at 10:52 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: > > > > > > > Joe Marcus Clarke writes: > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:56 +0800, Denise H. G. wrote: > > > > > > > >> It seems that without security/pinentry-gtk2, seahorse wou= ldn't get full > > > > > > > >> functions, such as adding new names to an existing key. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Is seahorse-plugins installed? > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Is this documented anywhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Joe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > I haven't found it on seahorse's official site. But I got thi= s on > > > > > > > redhat's bug archives and gentoo's: > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D474419 > > > > > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D159505 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Interesting because I don't see anywhere in the seahorse code w= here > > > > > > pinentry is executed. In fact, seahorse is working just fine f= or me > > > > > > without pinentry. Can you provide a sequence I can test which = will > > > > > > illustrate the problem caused by lacking pinentry-gtk2? > > > > >=20 > > > > > seahorse-agent is (now?) part of seahorse-plugins. This is neede= d > > > > > during session startup to provide services for evolution, etc... > > > >=20 > > > > Right, but everything is working just fine without pinentry. I jus= t > > > > have seahorse and seahorse-plugins installed. > > >=20 > > > Yes, i think that is all that is needed. Unless I've missed it > > > somewhere, there isn't a dependency on seahorse-plugins though. > >=20 > > No. The plug-ins are extra. They should probably be added to the > > fifth-toe or power-tools. Technically, Evo will work just fine with > > seahorse, but it will re-prompt you for your key password on every > > launch. >=20 > Hrm, not without an agent I don't think.... At least it wasn't for me > earlier today before I installed seahorse-plugins... I think it needs > either gpg-agent or seahorse-agent to work properly. That may be. I do have gpg-agent installed. But so should everyone as gnupg 2.0 is part of the GNOME Desktop. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-Q3WGcvGWAK5ppj7TCYB7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAklyrrAACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4cMlgCgpmtQfuLNtE9t4p+GWWpgvzfO aY4AoKoMgrDcvOabEUDmWHruQZeAynv2 =4z9H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Q3WGcvGWAK5ppj7TCYB7--