From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec  2 09:05:24 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D5916A41F
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2005 09:05:23 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from marco.calviani@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.207])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FB143D49
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Dec 2005 09:05:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from marco.calviani@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 37so548484wra
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:05:21 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=bE7eIyDcp2DMAf0qJgzNrYOaaQT0cvKOLUoYEH31E+4gWqPAWrw+wUXnpam3ccbmLdOzZXxgkGiH1lzkyybqLrF7kTROC81brqO+7d/z0oT2nD0DlQmozCS9TJaG12jtQaA0oBTMzQmzMIjElzDpgc1+jhBl00+Q7FbRWEMjqoU=
Received: by 10.64.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr1358412qba;
	Fri, 02 Dec 2005 01:05:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.243.16 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2005 01:05:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <da5cd1900512020105t60c1191cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:05:21 +0100
From: Marco Calviani <marco.calviani@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, 
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20051201141724.GE17066@poupinou.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <da5cd1900511300337t22728ec8y@mail.gmail.com>
	<da5cd1900511300553r40fcb922m@mail.gmail.com>
	<438DE9D0.6080107@root.org>
	<da5cd1900511301205g952b0an@mail.gmail.com>
	<20051130205130.GA10786@poupinou.org>
	<da5cd1900511301314p48c399a2k@mail.gmail.com>
	<438E2056.4020505@root.org> <20051130222525.GA11219@poupinou.org>
	<da5cd1900511302347ydd89af6h@mail.gmail.com>
	<20051201141724.GE17066@poupinou.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: cpufreq and changing driver
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:05:24 -0000

Hi Bruno,

 > > 2) sorry what about the point that we were discussing above? The high
> > number of transition you were explaining me, are present in the actual
> > implementation of powerd, and if not, why?
>
> It's not present under powerd for the simple fact that to be efficient
> in term of not being too intrusive (kernel to user data transfers, etc),
> powerd can only provide a limited number of check per second (at this
> time, 2 per second).  But the current algorithm present in powerd is
> not well suited in that case.  You have to wait one demi-second
> for the processor being put to full speed if the system was idle
> before.
>

Are there on the horizon any sort of plans to implement a newer and
more efficient algorithm to increase the number of transition per
second? Sorry but i've not understood why linux-cpufreqd is able to
cope with those without being so intrusive.....

Best regards,
MC