Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 16:21:44 +1000 (EST) From: Gary Roberts <gary@wcs.uq.oz.au> To: phk@ref.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SNAP or current? Message-ID: <9503100621.AA26597@wcs.uq.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <199503100247.SAA01682@ref.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Mar 9, 95 06:47:10 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > Which is more stable right now: the latest SNAP, or current? > > current is pretty good just now I think. >From previous comments I've seen, 2.1 is timed for April (perhaps a month from now). The last SNAP is a month old. If -current is good right now, is anyone likely to roll a new SNAP? Just curious ... (I find that the ease of the SNAP installs is a good way of dragging in a few converts who have the mistaken idea that *BSD installs are always difficult when compared with something like Linux :->.) Thanks for a great OS. I personally would have to *be* paid to go back to a commercial one now. Cheers, -- Gary Roberts (gary@wcs.uq.edu.au) (Ph +617 844 0400 Fax +617 844 0444) 4th Floor, South Bank House, 234 Grey St, South Bank QLD 4101 Australia.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9503100621.AA26597>