From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 9 22:22:22 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA06344 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:22:22 -0800 Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA06338 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:22:18 -0800 Received: from wcs.uq.edu.au (actually juno.wcs.uq.edu.au) by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au with SMTP (PP); Fri, 10 Mar 1995 16:21:49 +1000 Received: by wcs.uq.edu.au (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA26597; Fri, 10 Mar 95 16:21:45 EST From: Gary Roberts Message-Id: <9503100621.AA26597@wcs.uq.edu.au> Subject: Re: SNAP or current? To: phk@ref.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 16:21:44 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199503100247.SAA01682@ref.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Mar 9, 95 06:47:10 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 808 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > Which is more stable right now: the latest SNAP, or current? > > current is pretty good just now I think. >From previous comments I've seen, 2.1 is timed for April (perhaps a month from now). The last SNAP is a month old. If -current is good right now, is anyone likely to roll a new SNAP? Just curious ... (I find that the ease of the SNAP installs is a good way of dragging in a few converts who have the mistaken idea that *BSD installs are always difficult when compared with something like Linux :->.) Thanks for a great OS. I personally would have to *be* paid to go back to a commercial one now. Cheers, -- Gary Roberts (gary@wcs.uq.edu.au) (Ph +617 844 0400 Fax +617 844 0444) 4th Floor, South Bank House, 234 Grey St, South Bank QLD 4101 Australia.