From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  9 10:25:45 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93713106566C;
	Mon,  9 Nov 2009 10:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org)
Received: from kanar.ci0.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0b:1:50:40:63ff:feea:93a])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329D18FC0C;
	Mon,  9 Nov 2009 10:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kanar.ci0.org (pluxor@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.2/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA9AR5fk076085;
	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:05 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from mlfbsd@kanar.ci0.org)
Received: (from mlfbsd@localhost)
	by kanar.ci0.org (8.14.2/8.14.3/Submit) id nA9AR5oU076084;
	Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mlfbsd)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 11:27:04 +0100
From: Olivier Houchard <mlfbsd@ci0.org>
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20091109102704.GA75988@ci0.org>
References: <C534D902-9EAD-40DA-9A5E-8189592A9F77@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C534D902-9EAD-40DA-9A5E-8189592A9F77@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:25:45 -0000

On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 01:30:48PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
> I guess this has been discussed in the past but, can't we turn on ULE  
> on ARM embedded systems ? What's the bottleneck or performance  
> regression (assuming there's one) ?
> 
> --
> Rui Paulo

Hi,

At one point ULE was buggy on arm, but I think it's been fixed like years ago,
so it should be safe to use it.

Regards,

Olivier