From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 4 12:35:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx-a.qnet.com (mx-a.qnet.com [209.221.198.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7ABB37B4CF for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from cello.qnet.com (root@cello.qnet.com [209.221.198.10]) by mx-a.qnet.com (8.9.1a/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28880; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from STORK (56k-socal-05-43.dial.qnet.com [209.221.199.58]) by cello.qnet.com (8.9.0/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA08536; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) From: "Heredity Choice" To: "Mark Rowlands" , "Nate Puri" , Subject: RE: Satisfied w/ your desktop? Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 12:26:48 -0800 Message-ID: <002201c0469d$8ee7ce60$3ac7ddd1@STORK> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <00102806513900.03562@marbsd.tninet.se> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.5600 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Been using KDE for about a year ... tried a couple of others, Gnome for > example,found KDE good in terms of stability / functionality....I > hear from > the gnomers that big strides have been made in stability > so.......it maay also > now be worth a crack. but if a windows person asks me about using FreeBSD > for a personal computer KDE is the one I am going to show them I had heard that Gnome stability had improved and tried it. After 10 minutes it crashed. I shall stay with KDE. Paul Smith To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message