From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 14:57:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884B816A468; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A5013C448; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4793616F.9080102@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:57:51 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Royce Williams References: <1195488856.19739.42.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <4741BB44.7010906@freebsd.org> <20071122202437.GA77577@heff.fud.org.nz> <14958104.post@talk.nabble.com> <479128FA.1020204@alaska.net> In-Reply-To: <479128FA.1020204@alaska.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: s3raphi , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, cperciva@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.0, ZFS and freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:57:53 -0000 Royce Williams wrote: > s3raphi wrote, on 1/18/2008 12:19 PM: >> I am trying to run freebsd-update on 7.0-RC1 on a system with a ZFS >> root and >> am also having problems with flags: >> >> [root@newsrv ~]# freebsd-update install >> Installing updates...chflags: ///lib/libc.so.7: Operation not supported >> >> Is there a workaround for this? > > Since all of my filesystems on my 7.0 system are ZFS, I've been making a > copy of freebsd-update with the "chflag" calls commented out. Since ZFS > doesn't support flags yet, this is harmless. > > If any of your primary filesystems are not ZFS, this is not a good > solution. > > If you go this route, you'll have to watch for changes to freebsd-update > and reapply them. > > I expect that once ZFS is no longer considered experimental, > freebsd-update will have a way to handle this. > > Royce > Probably chflags failure should not be treated as a fatal error. NFS / would have the same failure mode. Kris