Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 20:03:19 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@mailbox.org> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@dan.me.uk, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/opendkim Message-ID: <87shdns2a0.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: <20171109174217.GB49221@home.opsec.eu> References: <87tvy3sctp.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> <20171109174217.GB49221@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:42:17 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Hi! > > > Bugzilla[1] lists three new and one open PR for mail/opendkim. Is the > > port still maintained? > > Yes, but some of the PRs are difficult to parse. > > > The port does not build with security/openssl-devel. There is a patch: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828466 > > https://sourceforge.net/p/opendkim/patches/37/ > > https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/plain/trunk/openssl_1.1.0_compat.patch?h=packages/opendkim > > > > The patch requires autoreconf. > > I generated a patch using that patch in > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223568 Thanks. I've just found out that the patch breaks the build with libressl. :-( Maybe the following lines are required: .if ${SSL_DEFAULT:Mopenssl-devel} USES+= autoreconf EXTRA_PATCHES= ${FILESDIR}\extra-patch-configure.ac \ ${FILESDIR}\extra-patch-opendkim_opendkim-crypto.c .endif > > Can you/anyone commit it? > > A simple build-test looks OK (but fails if LUA is enabled), > but I can't run-test it. Can you do it ? > > With LUA I've seen some strange thing on a simple build-test > on a loaded box, must re-do it in poudriere. Hmm, autoreconf obviously overwrites the LUA changes to configure. :-( pre-configure: ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e '/LIBLUA_LIBS/s/lua5\.[0-9]/lua-${LUA_VER}/' \ -e '/PKG_CONFIG/s/lua5\.[0-9]/lua-${LUA_VER}/' \ -- Herbert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87shdns2a0.wl-herbert>