From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 16 00:13:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA1C1065687; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:13:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:3ffc::401:25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6BA8FC0C; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:13:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dhcp-128-232-132-140.eduroam.csx.cam.ac.uk (dhcp-128-232-132-140.eduroam.csx.cam.ac.uk [128.232.132.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DF3E25D3878; Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" In-Reply-To: <50032E10.3060607@sentex.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:13:06 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <65702E3D-9373-4CC7-9CB4-81704EF44ED8@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <20110513162311.GK95084@glebius.int.ru> <4DD298AD.2060905@frasunek.com> <20110517184613.GN74366@glebius.int.ru> <4FDB1D71.6050908@freebsd.lublin.pl> <20120615203142.GW28613@glebius.int.ru> <4FDBAFD7.9020606@freebsd.lublin.pl> <4FDF2F81.6030307@sentex.net> <4FDF3097.6080701@freebsd.lublin.pl> <4FE0EE62.5070905@freebsd.lublin.pl> <4FF7F2C6.5070401@freebsd.lublin.pl> <20120709081225.GJ21957@glebius.int.ru> <4FFBB7A8.90201@rdtc.ru> <4FFBCA96.3000605@freebsd.lublin.pl> <50032E10.3060607@sentex.net> To: Mike Tancsa X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: Przemyslaw Frasunek , Ryan Stone , Eugene Grosbein , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mpd5/Netgraph issues after upgrading to 7.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:13:10 -0000 On 15. Jul 2012, at 20:54 , Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 7/10/2012 2:24 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: >>> It seems, Przemyslaw Frasunek uses proxyarp? >>> I have no such problems but I do not use proxyarp. >>> Could you get rid of it, Przemyslaw? >>=20 >> No, I don't use proxy ARP. I have about 300 PPPoE ng interfaces and = 10 VLANs >> with plain IP traffic. ARP table has only < 50 entries, all of them = are dynamic. >=20 > I had a new one. Unfortunately, it did not generate a coredump file = for > some reason. Kernel was from ~ mid Feb >=20 > Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode > cpuid =3D 1; apic id =3D 02 ... > Uptime: 151d12h10m10s > ipfw: 11 Deny TCP 192.168.1.99:33822 208.47.254.32:80 in via ng471 > Dumping 883 out of 8145 MB:ipfw: 13 Deny UDP 64.7.157.21:512 > 192.168.254.46:137 in via ng21 > panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? > cpuid =3D 1 > Uptime: 151d12h10m10s Hmm this one means we didn't stop all CPUs properly on panic; I think = that was fixed since? At least it's the reason you didn't have a chance to = get the core dump. However of course the initial problem leading to the panic of course is its own issue still. --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do!