From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 5 16:48:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4847A6C; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:48:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A7DC104C; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 16:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) X-Auth-ID: anat Received: from devlanhide.timeinc.net (HELO utka.zajac) ([209.251.200.245]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2015 12:47:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5571D2B5.1000308@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 12:47:49 -0400 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin , Mikhail Teterin CC: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r388577 - in head/devel: tcllib tcllibc References: <201506051339.t55DdNCJ011965@svn.freebsd.org> <20150605134227.GA56936@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150605134227.GA56936@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:48:08 -0000 On 05.06.2015 09:42, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > You could also use OPTIONS_EXCLUDE= DOCS MANPAGES But that's not the same thing -- my way, any options added to tcllib in the future will not be "inherited" by tcllibc. Your way they will be... I'm not sure, which option is more likely to cause more work in the future, but suspect, my way is better here -- because tcllibc is small and simple, it is unlikely to ever need to share an option with the master-port. Yours, -mi