From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 02:18:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AB816A41F for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:18:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC28143D45 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:18:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C949AD0A042 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:18:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:18:38 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 9/QZiIftRKdFFvvaOIx/HlmjazwRYpHBpHu2eFB8QH96 1132453117 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-194-139.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.194.139]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843CB5713DE for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:18:37 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:18:35 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200511191137.45598.plcplc@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511191137.45598.plcplc@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511200218.37151.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: portssystem stale dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:18:41 -0000 On Saturday 19 November 2005 10:37, Philip Lykke Carlsen wrote: > .. does anyone know why the problem of stale dependencies in the package > system occurs?.. it's just.. the system won't let you install any given > port/package without having met all the dependencies.. That's not entirely true, it's really only portupgrade and it's associated tools that have a serious problem with stale dependencies. Portmanager is much more forgiving, as is direct "make install" installation.