From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 8 22:13:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CA1DB62 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48D8E1729 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 22:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id j5so2100728qaq.4 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 14:13:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o1F/xjscNn6W7X+5jWdjAQfqz99/pxrfen6jFoj8Lwk=; b=Fd4+itYSvNT3pr0aTOFAVl4L3smi075/FFDwS5QjcX/dhRTy3K+TjIdBpxvj1xA0fQ vTCme6Gk+5whP3hXYpZDGm/tCecz7Pm8pANCdBB59Wv+ebgc2Auk+mfIFp8BTD5fIdBh +ptoqmyio5y9qyG8kXy024xmA7E96aNCYx/bTEFYD/q8ZA80MPrzw/Gfq4bsJC19+NKK tudrv3Ph3ozJTxqLkGdHGaJ/sNdXjFz5UuO4eNgxkwC218Lxhjgx8TERjKVXhdt56kHf uV2rwiT/ihX/St2r9vCAtGvrFHEf1ioFSWK5amN+klgjMvFQ8sFYjySV3Ru5/lR02NPe ZMsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.30.197 with SMTP id u5mr20291020qeh.33.1389219202451; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 14:13:22 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.52.8 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:13:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52CB4DAA.1010508@gmail.com> References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> <52C6572F.9090901@gmail.com> <52CB4DAA.1010508@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:13:22 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZdxdlPK_Seco2fkOTPdmtxC0Cas Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: Adrian Chadd To: Stephen Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Questions , Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 22:13:23 -0000 ... did anyone file bugs against these openjdk ports? :) -a On 6 January 2014 16:43, Stephen Cook wrote: > On 1/3/2014 1:22 AM, Stephen Cook wrote: >> >> On 1/2/2014 9:59 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Walter Hurry >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Well, if you want to risk it, just edit >>>> /usr/ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile >>>> and delete the "FORBIDDEN=" line. >>> >>> As already stated, it is not safe to do this unless you're running a >>> kernel >>> with the fix applied. A fresh 10-STABLE is such a kernel. >> >> >> I don't feel comfortable with my knowledge to run something that is not >> RELEASE yet. Is there a way to get the fix on 9.2? >> >> Can anyone point me to the bug(s) in question, so I can see what is going >> on / what I'm risking? >> >> I can also just run the Minecraft server on my PC, and open the router to >> let her friends play with her too. It is not as ideal though, because if I'm >> working I might have to cut them off. >> >> -- Stephen >> > > A bit more Googling helped me find this topic: > https://forums.freebsd.org/viewtopic.php?t=44098 > > Someone recommends "portdowngrade", which seems to allow me to install an > earlier version. He wrote "I found that b27 has been the last stable Java in > my Serviio media center. On b28, Java doesn't close files and eventually > pegs the kern.maxfilesperproc sysctl . On > b29, Java causes kernel panics on 9.2-RELEASE. Portdowngrade is your friend > in situations like this." > > Is this a bad idea? > > Thanks for any advice! > > > > -- Stephen > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"