From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 19 07:59:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C475A16A4CE for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:59:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D0743D45 for ; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:59:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id C2C45ACADB; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:59:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 09:59:52 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20040719075952.GG57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <20040718151649.GA53675@gothmog.gr> <20040718165142.GA17142@khazad.dyndns.org> <20040718184008.GC57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040719.005825.26202805.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VACxsDaSTfeluoxK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040719.005825.26202805.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr cc: zeratul2@wanadoo.es cc: nsouch@free.fr cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:59:55 -0000 --VACxsDaSTfeluoxK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:58:25AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: +> : Even if it is used by some programms, I don't see it in the base syste= m. +> : It can be always implemented as a kernel module and maintained outside +> : the tree. +>=20 +> Given that it is implemented in this driver in about 20 lines, I think +> that it makes sense to have it in the base. Suggesting it be +> maintained outside of the tree is just plain silly. It should be +> brought in or abadoned. It isn't even used by one of our 11000 ports and you want to bring it into base system? We don't have other devices in the tree, which are actually used by some ports. I still think, that if a port which is using /dev/full will be created, device should be maintained there. EOT. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --VACxsDaSTfeluoxK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA+394ForvXbEpPzQRAmWaAKCo1rdLZDTGtjPEWYDo4wK1HFVcQACfQJ7a wKlGPcdV5Z2pzBg9MgjHt48= =K9TJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VACxsDaSTfeluoxK--