From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 13 22:35:28 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4AB6D16A4D1; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:35:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F034A43E54; Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:32:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2])
	by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBE6TreF064418;
	Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:29:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org)
Message-Id: <200312140629.hBE6TreF064418@gw.catspoiler.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 22:29:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
To: jroberson@chesapeake.net
In-Reply-To: <20031212065656.R4201-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: mckusick@mckusick.com
cc: alc@FreeBSD.org
cc: mb@imp.ch
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: HAVE TRACE & DDB Re: FreeBSD 5.2-RC1 released
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 06:35:28 -0000

On 12 Dec, Jeff Roberson wrote:

> Looks like we're syncing the root inode for this filesystem.  Here's the
> buffer:
> b_flags = 0x200202a0<vmio,clusterok,done,delwri,cache>
> b_error = 0, b_bufsize = 16384, b_bcount = 16384, b_resid = 0
> b_dev = (4,31), b_data = 0xcf4de000, b_blkno = 224
> b_npages = 4, pages(OBJ, IDX, PA):
> (0, 0x1c, 0x181ef000),
> (0, 0x1d, 0x17e50000),
> (0, 0x1e, 0x180d1000),
> (0, 0x1f, 0x180b2000)

What about b_object?

Stupid question ... should b_object always be the same as
b_pages[0]->object, assuming b_npages > 0?