Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 01:18:03 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Two interfaces sharing the same IP address: how to change default route's interface on link change? Message-ID: <47BB7FCB.1090205@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080219221636.GC5164@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20080219221636.GC5164@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > In summary, favor wired connectivity over the wireless one, at any time: > could this be at boot time or not. > > I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who wants this kind of setup. So > how did you achieve this setup? The forwarding code needs to be changed to support the notion of a floating static, regardless. Recall that in BSD default routes configured statically, whether manually or by DHCP, have the RTF_STATIC flg set. Currently, the BSD behaviour is NOT to update the rt_ifp for an RTF_STATUC route when ifadown is called. I believe this to be correct and honours the original API contract of RTF_STATIC. It is not what you desire in your use case however. Configuring ifstated to manually replumb addresses and routes is probably an easier place to start. Seamless migration is not possible yet; generally sockets are tied to the interface where they were implicitly bound, also nexthop selection happens purely on the basis of destination address. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47BB7FCB.1090205>