From owner-freebsd-current  Mon May 10 18:16:18 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 48A4F1508D; Mon, 10 May 1999 18:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA16055;
	Mon, 10 May 1999 19:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 19:36:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <199905102336.TAA16055@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>
Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>,
	Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>,
	"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@visi.com>,
	"Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SPAM 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9905101708530.401-100000@picnic.mat.net>
References: <199905102059.QAA15633@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
	<Pine.BSF.4.10.9905101708530.401-100000@picnic.mat.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Mon, 10 May 1999 17:10:38 -0400 (EDT), Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> said:

> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes.  Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn't hold
> for those lists,

Yes they do.

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message