Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:05:14 +0100 From: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" <tingox@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amule 2.2.3 port - ready for test Message-ID: <ef8c8a880901180405madc0c5bw3e3a218afcad825b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <39b650464a96fa082375cd320c27299d.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> References: <ef8c8a880901091823w7cd4a797g30d70044478e60d3@mail.gmail.com> <20090110162025.3fa38c70@chii.bluelife.at> <ef8c8a880901100828m5df08012leb05554f2287268e@mail.gmail.com> <39b650464a96fa082375cd320c27299d.squirrel@webmail.itac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Bernhard Fr=F6hlich <decke@bluelife.at> wr= ote: > On Sat, January 10, 2009 5:28 pm, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at> >> wrote: >>> I've applied your patch and compiled the port in an i386 Tinderbox for >>> 6-STABLE and 7-STABLE. It compiles fine but leaves a few files behind >>> and deletes a few directories which it shouldn't. >> >> Thanks for testing. A new patch will be sent to the mailing list. >> I really must get my own tinderbox running again soon. > > I've build your -5 patch and tinderbox keeps complaining about some > missing directories. I'm still having problems getting my own tinderbox to run. Maybe I should just reinstall it (it was upgraded). amule - I wonder why 'port test' doesn't complain about missing files like your tinderbox does? --=20 Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef8c8a880901180405madc0c5bw3e3a218afcad825b>