From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 6 07:31:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C51463; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC04B2C22; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B846E8B; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 07:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 526E45186D; Sun, 6 Oct 2013 09:31:06 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Hiroki Sato Subject: Re: jail configuration References: <86k3igki36.fsf@nine.des.no> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720FBCA6EB@LTCFISWMSGMB21.FNFIS.com> <86d2o8k6zf.fsf@nine.des.no> <20131006.102310.20550923549608963.hrs@allbsd.org> Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 09:31:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20131006.102310.20550923549608963.hrs@allbsd.org> (Hiroki Sato's message of "Sun, 06 Oct 2013 10:23:10 +0900 (JST)") Message-ID: <8638oerh39.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, dteske@FreeBSD.org, jamie@FreeBSD.org, slw@zxy.spb.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 07:31:04 -0000 Hiroki Sato writes: > I tried to rewrite a rc.d/jail with backward compatibility. [...] > What do you think about this? I think it sounds fantastic (and like a lot of work!) I didn't look at the patch very closely, but I see that you print a warning when you generate a configuration for an old-style jail while jail.conf exists. I think you should *always* print that warning for every old-style jail so people will be reminded to convert. We should also remove the examples from /etc/defaults/rc.conf and replace the documentation for jail_${_j}_* in rc.conf(5) with a short paragraph that says they are for compatibility only. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no