From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Dec  5 07:26:05 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id HAA08749
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 07:26:05 -0800
Received: from kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (130@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com [198.178.203.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA08738
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 07:25:56 -0800
Received: (from aevans@localhost) by kaiwan009.kaiwan.com (8.7/8.7) id HAA04925; Tue, 5 Dec 1995 07:24:26 -0800 (PST)
	*** KAIWAN Internet Access ***
From: "Alan B. Evans" <aevans@kaiwan.com>
Message-Id: <199512051524.HAA04925@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>
Subject: Re: Name Server : Lame Delegation ?
To: team_fbf@pristine.com.tw (ywliu)
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 1995 07:24:26 -0800 (PST)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199512051638.QAA00143@neptune.pristine.com.tw> from "ywliu" at Dec 5, 95 04:38:01 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Hi,
> 
>   Our FreeBSD 2.05R named always reports things like "Lame delegation to
> xxx.xxx.xxxx from xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx on name xxxxx.xxxx.xxxx".  What does this
> mean ? Do I have to do anything with it ?
> 
> Yen-Wei Liu
> 
> 
> 

The times I've seen this have been when the primary name server is serving
up dns for my domain, but the secondary name server didn't have a clue
as to who I was.

--alan


--
You can reach me at @ :
inet	: aevans@kaiwan.com
ICBM    : 33 39' N 117 59' W   Cruise : 33 39' 37" N 117 59' 54" W
WWW	: http://www.kaiwan.com/~aevans/
Geek	: GE d--(-+) H  s g-(+) p? au+ a w+(+++) v C+++(++++) UL++++ UB+++ UV++
(v2.1)	  P++ L+++ 3 N++ E K- !W !M !V -po+ Y t+ 5+ !j R G? tv-- b+++ D++ B-
	  e++ u h f- r !n y+ 
jihad	: B+- US TF !GM TM F ?MA FP PA++ WP+++ AB ?PI I+
	  UF+++ D+++ !TV !AP !QP S V- A DM++ SB JW++
	  !M !TP