Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
From:      doug <doug@safeport.com>
To:        Pete Wright <pete@nomadlogic.org>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: List managers [Was: Link usability]
Message-ID:  <34bfdc5d-47e7-f2dc-9560-d5c39f34bbca@safeport.com>
In-Reply-To: <7e683c8f-0bb4-74c8-386e-5c4dff5f0804@nomadlogic.org>
References:  <ca17a158b68d6cf2d0c261cc5f4268d5ef367482.camel@blues-softwares.net> <3faa3481-abe3-47cd-f273-2658db42a5bc@gmail.com> <11239785ba0531583f29189b133ceafdcded8aad.camel@blues-softwares.net> <ac194575-8e40-5e19-2478-a69fffbab278@freebsd.org> <5f1028aadd42bcbd89c62e843fc59798c52a0f36.camel@blues-softwares.net> <9B5F5E1E-555D-4FA8-AFBE-EBBD3A8A7045@nimnet.asn.au> <6eaa6e1f-af45-41f8-a5d7-2f03eb4f456a@freebsd.org> <A7E64A3C-2D9C-4368-ACC9-A81403C163EC@nimnet.asn.au> <20230321192209.giqsnhqbl7ben6vk@beesty.loosely.org> <7e683c8f-0bb4-74c8-386e-5c4dff5f0804@nomadlogic.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--621616949-1957973882-1679667034=:45353
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, Pete Wright wrote:

>
>
> On 3/21/23 12:22, possessor.assizer305@aceecat.org wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:49:11PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
>> 
>>> Ah, right.  Yet another consequence of the regressive move from
>>> mailman plus pipermail to mlmmj is loss of clickable links in the
>>> archived messages.  Duh!
>> Out of curiosity, what was the rationale for the move?
>> 
>> My opinion:
>> Mailman has its warts but it's ubiquitous and well suited for
>> a world where almost everything has to be done in the browser
>> for $REASONS.
>> 
> my understanding is that mailman was tied to python2, and the next version of 
> mailman (v3 iirc) that supports python3 is incompatible with the previous 
> version.  i think it also had a bunch of other shortcomings/issues.  so i 
> suspect the lift to use mlmmj was easier than moving to mailman v3.
>
> i agree its an unfortunate situation, but its i think it would be 
> irresponsible to rely on python2 for such critical infrastructure.
>
Boo on the mailman project. There is a conversion utility that takes care 
of the syntax changes. The only maajor changes I hit were the MySQL, and a 
couple of DNS modules. In something as complex as mailman I am sure there 
was more but relative to just maintaining something that complex well 
within there Python knowledge I would assume.
--621616949-1957973882-1679667034=:45353--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34bfdc5d-47e7-f2dc-9560-d5c39f34bbca>